What will Apple's security teams do in the future to better inform corporate and enterprise security teams of what they are doing? If anyone wants additional questions asked, post them here and I'll try and get them in.ĭoes Apple believe they are allowed to act unilaterally when it comes to security on client systems?ĭoes Apple believe that a company should NOT be allowed to decide if they want to continue with a version of a piece of software even if there are exploits in the wild? E.g Allow the company to do its own risk assessment, NOT Apple. Here's the questions I've come up with that they've gotten already so they can come prepared with answers. It may be the second coming of pissed off Steve Jobs, which I've witnessed firsthand. I never expected to have such good answers! I might just have to grumble here more -) I'm still happily touting JAMFNation as the best user group around! Thanks all! Separately, I strongly believe that this is a great thing for their consumer business. What I'm really grumbling about is the fact that Apple seriously needs to understand that they also have enterprise customers and should provide the ability to manage XProtect in a fully supported manner. I'm lucky in the fact that the few things that we use Java for work with all the new versions, and that Flash and Java are extremely easy to distribute. I suppose that I should be fair here and state that my objections to this process are merely that of a grumbling admin. I'm going to keep that one in my back pocket! This looks like safe route to travel, and allows for management of the plist! Awesome! CasperSally: I worry about the ramifications of proceeding in that direction, though I do greatly appreciate it! I'm going to remember that I can yank it that rtrouton: Brilliant.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |